Filter by Location
insideARM Weekly Recap - Week of August 26th, 2024
3 September 2024
Federal Judge Sanctions Pittsburgh Law Firm for Writing ‘Imaginary’ Letters on Behalf of Clients in Debt Disputes
28 August 2024
Missouri Federal Court Dismisses FDCPA Claim Over Letters Sent to Plaintiffs’ Attorney
30 July 2024
District Court Highlights the Importance of Precise Dispute Letters When Challenging Debt Collection
18 June 2024
insideARM Weekly Recap – Week of May 27th, 2024
3 June 2024
Opting Out of Letters? Not So Fast Says Texas Court
30 May 2024
District Court Dismisses FDCPA Suit; Clarifies Debt Collector Communication on Identity Theft
11 January 2024
Judge Dismisses FDCPA Case Alleging Violations Based on Undated Model Validation Notice
11 December 2023
Undated Model Debt Violation Notice Does Not Violate the FDCPA
21 November 2023
3rd Cir Case Highlights Difficulty with Medical Debt Collection Demands
16 November 2023
Compliance with Reg F is Not the Same as Compliance With the FDCPA, Says Court
21 September 2023
Seventh Circuit Rules $3.95 in Postage Spent by Plaintiff to Respond to Second Validation Notice Sufficient to Establish FDCPA Standing
28 June 2023
Washington Federal Court Rejects Hunstein; Holds Article III Standing Exists in FDCPA Letter-Vendor Claim
23 May 2023
Sending Docs After the Validation Period Expires? One Court Says, No
19 April 2023
Court Finds Letter to Debtor is Not a Debt-Collection Communication Under the FDCPA
18 January 2023
Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of FDCPA Mailer-Vendor Claims
11 January 2023
A Look Back at 2022 in Consumer Credit and Collections Case Law and Federal and State Regulation
5 January 2023
“It’s About ‘That’ Time” for the CFPB to Comment on Hunstein
31 October 2022
Multiple Settlement Offers in One Letter are not Misleading
5 October 2022
Court Grants Debt Collector Summary Judgment in FDCPA Claim Based on Collection Letter With Multiple Addresses
3 October 2022